
| Post date: Sat, Feb 29, 2020 |
| Category: Economic Development |
| By: IEA Kenya, |
In the midst of raging public debate, what is the economic importance of Rangelands? We know from evidence since time immemorial that Rangelands produce substantial products such as forage, wildlife habitat, water, minerals, energy, recreational opportunities, and some wood products. For scientists, they sustain plant and animal gene pools. Primarily for the northern Kenya, Eastern Kenya and some of the Rift Valley communities who are pastoralists they use Rangelands to graze livestock.
Rangelands also produce intangible products like aesthetic value such as natural beauty and open spaces. They also offer the opportunity for the ecological study of natural ecosystems and wildlife conservation. Regional Center for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD) estimates that the Kenyan rangelands through livestock production, contribute to over 12% of the 40% Agricultural GDP with further contribution through the tourism sector. Last year, the agricultural sector total contribution to the GDP was 3.05 trillion hence the rangelands contribution to GDP amounted to Ksh 360 billion (KNBS 2019). This blog aims to show that Rangelands exists because they offer economic benefits to society and focus on the wildlife conservation policy within Kenya’s rangelands.
Given the returns from agriculture and other forms of productivity, there’s a shift from wildlife conservation to other forms of production. In economics, this is a shift in production possibility frontier. Over half of the most productive rangelands in Kenya, which used to hold the great majority of wildlife, are now supporting agricultural production with an associated rapid evolution of property rights from large land parcels under communal or group ownership to small land parcels under private ownership.
From data declared by Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, we see a considerable number of animal species kept in Animal Conservancies. They play a bigger role in Kenya’s conservation story. The top five animals kept in Kenya’s Rangelands are Wildebeest, Burchell’s Zebra, Grant’s Gaz, Impala and Thomson’s. Across all the species, the numbers have been fairly stable. Most of the animal species have remained within the same rangeland.
Table 1: Wildlife Population Estimates in the Kenya Rangelands, 2014 – 2018(‘000)

Source: (KNBS 2019)
The Wildlife Conservation and Management Regulations, 2017 gives power to the Wildlife service to maintain status and components of listed species in ecosystems in Kenya. For that to happen, the regulation efforts must be accompanied by resources because not all wildlife ecosystems belong to Government. Other ecosystems are managed by the private sector. Therefore, wildlife conservation policy should be alive to that by providing incentives. Otherwise, rangeland owners will shift to other highly productive areas and governments policy of wildlife conservation in the rangelands will fail.
References
KNBS. 2019. Economic Survey. Nairobi: Kenya Bureau of Statistics.
The Wildlife Conservation and Management Regulations. 2017.
KNBS. 2019. Statistical Abstract. Annual Statistical Abstract, Nairobi: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.
| Post date: Sat, Feb 29, 2020 | | Category: Economic Development | | By: IEA Kenya, |
In the midst of raging public debate, what is the economic importance of Rangelands? We know from evidence since time immemorial that Rangelands produce substantial products such as forage, wildlife habitat, water, minerals, energy, recreational opportunities, and some wood products. For scientists, they sustain plant and animal gene pools. Primarily for the northern Kenya, Eastern Kenya and some of the Rift Valley communities who are pastoralists they use Rangelands to graze livestock.
Rangelands also produce intangible products like aesthetic value such as natural beauty and open spaces. They also offer the opportunity for the ecological study of natural ecosystems and wildlife conservation. Regional Center for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD) estimates that the Kenyan rangelands through livestock production, contribute to over 12% of the 40% Agricultural GDP with further contribution through the tourism sector. Last year, the agricultural sector total contribution to the GDP was 3.05 trillion hence the rangelands contribution to GDP amounted to Ksh 360 billion (KNBS 2019). This blog aims to show that Rangelands exists because they offer economic benefits to society and focus on the wildlife conservation policy within Kenya’s rangelands.
Given the returns from agriculture and other forms of productivity, there’s a shift from wildlife conservation to other forms of production. In economics, this is a shift in production possibility frontier. Over half of the most productive rangelands in Kenya, which used to hold the great majority of wildlife, are now supporting agricultural production with an associated rapid evolution of property rights from large land parcels under communal or group ownership to small land parcels under private ownership.
From data declared by Kenya National Bureau of Statistics, we see a considerable number of animal species kept in Animal Conservancies. They play a bigger role in Kenya’s conservation story. The top five animals kept in Kenya’s Rangelands are Wildebeest, Burchell’s Zebra, Grant’s Gaz, Impala and Thomson’s. Across all the species, the numbers have been fairly stable. Most of the animal species have remained within the same rangeland.
Table 1: Wildlife Population Estimates in the Kenya Rangelands, 2014 – 2018(‘000)

Source: (KNBS 2019)
The Wildlife Conservation and Management Regulations, 2017 gives power to the Wildlife service to maintain status and components of listed species in ecosystems in Kenya. For that to happen, the regulation efforts must be accompanied by resources because not all wildlife ecosystems belong to Government. Other ecosystems are managed by the private sector. Therefore, wildlife conservation policy should be alive to that by providing incentives. Otherwise, rangeland owners will shift to other highly productive areas and governments policy of wildlife conservation in the rangelands will fail.
References
KNBS. 2019. Economic Survey. Nairobi: Kenya Bureau of Statistics.
The Wildlife Conservation and Management Regulations. 2017.
KNBS. 2019. Statistical Abstract. Annual Statistical Abstract, Nairobi: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.

We developed a #PublicDebtCounter a real-time dashboard tracking Kenya’s national debt growth.
The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA-Kenya) has made a compilation of 52 essays that refutes common statements about the Kenyan economy that lack sound Economic rationale.
The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA Kenya) has emerged as one of the top Think Tanks in Kenya and Sub Saharan Africa, according to the 2020 Global Index Report by the Lauder Institute of the University of Pennsylvania. The ranking identifies think tanks that excel in research, analysis and public engagement on a wide range […]
Friday, 06 November 2020: The Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA-Kenya) in partnership with the National Democratic Institute (NDI) held a media briefing to discuss the “Implementation of the national government budget FY 2019/20: Implication of gaps and deviations?” The findings and evidence generated from the analysis of budget oversight documents will be used to establish […]
In 2012, Kenya’s oil discoveries were greeted with nationalist fervor. Pundits, officials, and their surrogates played avatar to the proposition that Kenya’s economic wants would soon be fulfilled by an oil bonanza. Some were inspired to prepare for a migration of labor and capital into oil production. Others erred towards caution. Others still expressed the […]