Case Adjournments is one of the key issues that contributes to case backlogs because it reduces the efficiency of courts. An adjournment in a legal setting involves pausing or temporally stopping ongoing proceedings to be continued at a later time, date, or location. It may also indicate the end of the day’s proceedings. Parties involved in the case can request adjournments, or they may be initiated by the court itself due to reasons such as key individuals being unavailable, the requirement for additional evidence, or logistical concerns.[i]
Why do case adjournments and how it affects efficiency of courts and the additional case burden it bring to the Judicial system an important factor? Its due to the fact that a Judicial System is a creation of the Constitution which demands a significant level of efficiency that is close to 100% because it forbids undue delay of justice. Secondly, when public goods are not provided efficiently, they end up creating other systemic inefficiencies which creates an overall drag in the economy. The Constitution is an economic document because it outlines key institutions that direct economic activity and sets the initial conditions on how economic agents operate.
The judicial system functions as a public good due to its inherent characteristics of non-excludability and non-rivalry. It is accessible to all individuals without discrimination, ensuring that no one is excluded from seeking justice or resolving disputes through legal means. This inclusivity is evident in the wide outreach of judicial services across various regions, from rural villages to urban districts, ensuring access for everyone. The judicial process is non-rivalrous; each case is treated independently and does not impact others’ ability to seek legal remedies or benefit from the system. The judicial system’s ability to provide equal access to justice and its unimpeded benefits make it a public good essential for a functioning society (Lochav & Bhatacharjee, 2018).[ii]
Magistrates’ Courts handle the majority of matters (74.2%), followed by the High Court (11.5%), ELC (4.2%), Kadhis’ Courts (5.3%), Small Claims Courts (1.2%), Tribunals (1.3%), ELRC (1.9%), Court of Appeal (0.4%), and lastly the Supreme Court. The case burden here is primarily explained by the fact that the Magistrates Court is a court of first instance. A court of first instance is the court that first assumes jurisdiction over a case and is also considered the court where proceedings begin.[iii]
Magistrates’ Courts have the highest number of adjournments (175,881), followed by the High Court (18,576), ELC (7,247), ELRC (1,186), Small Claims Courts (2,015), Kadhis’ Courts (2,431), Tribunals (1,960), Court of Appeal (1,295), and Supreme Court. Magistrates’ Courts have the highest share of adjournments (83.5%), followed by the High Court (8.8%), ELC (3.4%), Small Claims Courts (1.0%), Kadhis’ Courts (1.2%), Tribunals (0.9%), ELRC (0.6%), Court of Appeal (0.6%), and Supreme Court as shown in the table below.
Magistrates’ Courts have the highest share of adjournments (83.5%), followed by the High Court (8.8%), ELC (3.4%), Small Claims Courts (1.0%), Kadhis’ Courts (1.2%), Tribunals (0.9%), ELRC (0.6%), Court of Appeal (0.6%), and lastly Supreme Court.
By dividing 210,592 adjournment of cases for 52 weeks, I find that they are at least 4050 case adjournments every week. That’s 101 cases for every working hour.
The reasons for adjournment can be broadly categorized into two main types: external (agency) reasons and internal (court) reasons as explained in the State of the Judiciary and the Administration of Justice Annual Report Financial Year 2022/23. The External (Agency) Reasons include Parties not being present or ready, witnesses or reports not being prepared, advocates not being available, and prosecution not being ready or present are all examples of external reasons for adjournment. These factors are often beyond the immediate control of the court and may require better coordination and communication among stakeholders to mitigate. The Internal (Court) Reasons include Internal reasons for adjournment include the court being indisposed, judgments not being ready, and the court not sitting. These reasons are more within the court’s control and may indicate a need for improved administrative processes, scheduling, and resource management.
67 of every 100 cases are adjourned because of external reasons. 33 of 3all cases are adjourned because of internal reasons.
What does the Case Adjournment Numbers Mean for Access to Justice.
The analysis of court adjournments and case burdens reveals significant challenges in the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial system, with implications for access to justice. Case adjournments, often resulting from both external and internal factors, contribute to case backlogs and reduce the efficiency of courts. In conclusion, I make the following policy recommendations.
[i] Legal Information Institute. (2021). adjourn. LII / Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/adjourn#:~:text=Adjourn%20is%20the%20final%20closing
[ii] Lochav, M., & Bhatacharjee, M. (2018). Factors influencing the Efficiency of Judiciary A Public Good Provision. GSJ, 6(7). https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/FACTORS-INFLUENCING-THE-EEFICIENCY-OF-JUDICIARY-A-PUBLIC-GOOD-PROVISION.pdf
[iii] oxfordreference. (2024). Court of First Instance. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095643675#:~:text=1%20A%20court%20in%20which,may%20be%20heard%20on%20appeal.
In a Public-public-private partnership, the private partner typically assumes many responsibilities throughout the project life cycle. In a Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) model, the private entity is responsible for an infrastructure project’s design, construction, financing, and operation for a specific period. The private entity, called the concessionaire, operates the project and recovers construction costs through user fees, […]
This blog highlights IEA’s most recent work on taxation, a problem-driven political economy analysis of taxation.[i] After the study’s publication, a webinar was held to discuss the findings of the political economy analysis available here. [ii] In the introduction, the study outlines how Kenya’s tax policy faces challenges from its political ecosystem, structural factors, and […]
Introduction In February 2023, the Kenyan government announced its intention to establish a framework that will enable Savings and Credit Cooperative Societies (SACCOs) to extend loans to each other. This inter-Sacco lending framework shall be set up by the Sacco Societies Regulatory Authority (SASRA) and was anticipated to be in effect from August 2023. This […]
While Kenya has long implemented the NHIF (National Hospital Insurance Fund) whose core mandate is to provide medical insurance coverage to all its members and their declared dependants and also to make medical care affordable, enrolment rates, particularly in the voluntary and informal sectors, remain low. Yet, NHIF is the most common type of health […]
Introduction According to the United Nations, Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) are “bilateral agreements between two countries which allocate taxing rights over income between those two countries thereby preventing double taxation of income. The main objective of DTAs therefore, is to prevent and or eliminate avoidance and evasion of taxes on income and capital by both […]
Post date: Wed, Apr 3, 2024 |
Category: Court |
By: Leo Kipkogei Kemboi, |
Case Adjournments is one of the key issues that contributes to case backlogs because it reduces the efficiency of courts. An adjournment in a legal setting involves pausing or temporally stopping ongoing proceedings to be continued at a later time, date, or location. It may also indicate the end of the day’s proceedings. Parties involved in the case can request adjournments, or they may be initiated by the court itself due to reasons such as key individuals being unavailable, the requirement for additional evidence, or logistical concerns.[i]
Why do case adjournments and how it affects efficiency of courts and the additional case burden it bring to the Judicial system an important factor? Its due to the fact that a Judicial System is a creation of the Constitution which demands a significant level of efficiency that is close to 100% because it forbids undue delay of justice. Secondly, when public goods are not provided efficiently, they end up creating other systemic inefficiencies which creates an overall drag in the economy. The Constitution is an economic document because it outlines key institutions that direct economic activity and sets the initial conditions on how economic agents operate.
The judicial system functions as a public good due to its inherent characteristics of non-excludability and non-rivalry. It is accessible to all individuals without discrimination, ensuring that no one is excluded from seeking justice or resolving disputes through legal means. This inclusivity is evident in the wide outreach of judicial services across various regions, from rural villages to urban districts, ensuring access for everyone. The judicial process is non-rivalrous; each case is treated independently and does not impact others’ ability to seek legal remedies or benefit from the system. The judicial system’s ability to provide equal access to justice and its unimpeded benefits make it a public good essential for a functioning society (Lochav & Bhatacharjee, 2018).[ii]
Magistrates’ Courts handle the majority of matters (74.2%), followed by the High Court (11.5%), ELC (4.2%), Kadhis’ Courts (5.3%), Small Claims Courts (1.2%), Tribunals (1.3%), ELRC (1.9%), Court of Appeal (0.4%), and lastly the Supreme Court. The case burden here is primarily explained by the fact that the Magistrates Court is a court of first instance. A court of first instance is the court that first assumes jurisdiction over a case and is also considered the court where proceedings begin.[iii]
Magistrates’ Courts have the highest number of adjournments (175,881), followed by the High Court (18,576), ELC (7,247), ELRC (1,186), Small Claims Courts (2,015), Kadhis’ Courts (2,431), Tribunals (1,960), Court of Appeal (1,295), and Supreme Court. Magistrates’ Courts have the highest share of adjournments (83.5%), followed by the High Court (8.8%), ELC (3.4%), Small Claims Courts (1.0%), Kadhis’ Courts (1.2%), Tribunals (0.9%), ELRC (0.6%), Court of Appeal (0.6%), and Supreme Court as shown in the table below.
Magistrates’ Courts have the highest share of adjournments (83.5%), followed by the High Court (8.8%), ELC (3.4%), Small Claims Courts (1.0%), Kadhis’ Courts (1.2%), Tribunals (0.9%), ELRC (0.6%), Court of Appeal (0.6%), and lastly Supreme Court.
By dividing 210,592 adjournment of cases for 52 weeks, I find that they are at least 4050 case adjournments every week. That’s 101 cases for every working hour.
The reasons for adjournment can be broadly categorized into two main types: external (agency) reasons and internal (court) reasons as explained in the State of the Judiciary and the Administration of Justice Annual Report Financial Year 2022/23. The External (Agency) Reasons include Parties not being present or ready, witnesses or reports not being prepared, advocates not being available, and prosecution not being ready or present are all examples of external reasons for adjournment. These factors are often beyond the immediate control of the court and may require better coordination and communication among stakeholders to mitigate. The Internal (Court) Reasons include Internal reasons for adjournment include the court being indisposed, judgments not being ready, and the court not sitting. These reasons are more within the court’s control and may indicate a need for improved administrative processes, scheduling, and resource management.
67 of every 100 cases are adjourned because of external reasons. 33 of 3all cases are adjourned because of internal reasons.
What does the Case Adjournment Numbers Mean for Access to Justice.
The analysis of court adjournments and case burdens reveals significant challenges in the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial system, with implications for access to justice. Case adjournments, often resulting from both external and internal factors, contribute to case backlogs and reduce the efficiency of courts. In conclusion, I make the following policy recommendations.
[i] Legal Information Institute. (2021). adjourn. LII / Legal Information Institute. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/adjourn#:~:text=Adjourn%20is%20the%20final%20closing
[ii] Lochav, M., & Bhatacharjee, M. (2018). Factors influencing the Efficiency of Judiciary A Public Good Provision. GSJ, 6(7). https://www.globalscientificjournal.com/researchpaper/FACTORS-INFLUENCING-THE-EEFICIENCY-OF-JUDICIARY-A-PUBLIC-GOOD-PROVISION.pdf
[iii] oxfordreference. (2024). Court of First Instance. https://www.oxfordreference.com/display/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095643675#:~:text=1%20A%20court%20in%20which,may%20be%20heard%20on%20appeal.
In a Public-public-private partnership, the private partner typically assumes many responsibilities throughout the project life cycle. In a Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) model, the private entity is responsible for an infrastructure project’s design, construction, financing, and operation for a specific period. The private entity, called the concessionaire, operates the project and recovers construction costs through user fees, […]
This blog highlights IEA’s most recent work on taxation, a problem-driven political economy analysis of taxation.[i] After the study’s publication, a webinar was held to discuss the findings of the political economy analysis available here. [ii] In the introduction, the study outlines how Kenya’s tax policy faces challenges from its political ecosystem, structural factors, and […]
Introduction In February 2023, the Kenyan government announced its intention to establish a framework that will enable Savings and Credit Cooperative Societies (SACCOs) to extend loans to each other. This inter-Sacco lending framework shall be set up by the Sacco Societies Regulatory Authority (SASRA) and was anticipated to be in effect from August 2023. This […]
While Kenya has long implemented the NHIF (National Hospital Insurance Fund) whose core mandate is to provide medical insurance coverage to all its members and their declared dependants and also to make medical care affordable, enrolment rates, particularly in the voluntary and informal sectors, remain low. Yet, NHIF is the most common type of health […]
Introduction According to the United Nations, Double Taxation Agreements (DTAs) are “bilateral agreements between two countries which allocate taxing rights over income between those two countries thereby preventing double taxation of income. The main objective of DTAs therefore, is to prevent and or eliminate avoidance and evasion of taxes on income and capital by both […]